One good way to learn is to sit at the feet of a good teacher.
But a better way to learn is to wash the feet of those teachers with the greatest minds, the intellectual giants of the Western Tradition.
When it comes to education, Plato’s Socrates considered dialogue to be the best vehicle for acquiring knowledge; apparently, he disapproved of writing believing it was one of the quickest ways to miss the point.
If we only read books, he argues, we might get the gist of the thing being taught, but we won’t be able to ask questions about those things we didn’t understand. He felt that by reading, we would miss the tones, the nuances, and ultimately, the point. To get to listen, ask questions, and receive feedback from someone in the know is the most valuable learning experience.
Cardinal John Henry Newman observed just how valuable it was when he wrote,
“The general principles of any study you may learn by books; but the detail, the color, the tone, the air, the life which makes it live in us, you must catch all these from those in who it lives already” (Idea of a University).
In other words, some things are better caught than taught he thought. (See what I did there? 😉 )
The only problem with all this is access the great minds is usually limited. And, even if there were numerous great minds alive during our own lifetime, the probability that we would ever meet them, let alone get to know them, personally, or learn from them, is only one notch next to nil.
For example, Leo Strauss once asserted,
Teachers themselves are pupils and must be pupils. But there cannot be an infinite regress: ultimately there must be teachers who are not in turn pupils. Those teachers who are not in turn pupils are the great minds or, in order to avoid any ambiguity in a matter of such importance, the greatest minds. Such men are extremely rare. We are not likely to meet any of them in any classroom. We are not likely to meet any of them anywhere. It is a piece of good luck if there is a single one alive in one’s time. For all practical purposes, pupils, of whatever degree of proficiency, have access to the teachers who are not in turn pupils, to the greatest minds, only through the great books. Liberal education will then consist in studying with the proper care the great books which the greatest minds have left behind….!
He is saying if we want to learn from the great minds, we will more than likely have to seek them out in books. But, you ask, what is wrong with just sitting at the feet of a good teacher?
Well, if we can find a good teacher who is already versed in the wisdom of these greatest minds and is willing to discuss their great ideas, all the better. It’s good to sit at their feet.
But these teachers will merely be a guide. The real teachers will be the great minds they lead us to—in books.
And, if you want to learn from these intellectual giants, you’ll first have to learn what it means to wash their feet (John 13:14).
You may be interested in listening to the most recent episode of the Consortium Podcast my colleague and I recorded on The Four Levels of Reading, from Mortimer J. Adler’s How to Read a Book.
Robert Renteria Jr says
Based on your title, ‘Washing Giants’ Feet,’ it is interesting Socrates had a reputation of not wearing shoes. Socrates wisdom from the perspective of writing versus oral means to convey truth suggests another ancient of an even greater mind who neither wrote on his own behalf. Like Socrates, Jesus used the personal, face to face dialogue as means of inter-communication. Ironically, Jesus’ followers wrote a considerable amount of what he said. With the thought in mind, ‘if written the world itself could contain all that Jesus did,’ I would say Jesus had differing intentions. Inversely, had Plato not written the many things fruitful sayings or deeds of Socrates our conception of him may have been quite different. Although over 2,500 years ago, the writings of Plato have sustained for us an image of Socrates which we have been able to relate to. It is ironic Socrates proposed the contrary. Socrates affinity for justice was not simply a lofty ideal but practical and realistic. He relegated writing as means for fabrications and not truth. The disdain for writing was to promote a soul worthy and noble. Socrates believed the only things worthy of remembrance and we will remember are the actual truth. It is also ironic how similar Jesus and Socrates were humanly speaking. Enough said lest I forget…